The New England Comparative Effectiveness Public Advisory Council (New England CEPAC), a core program of the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), is a nationally-recognized community forum. The New England CEPAC convenes three times each year at public meetings to review objective evidence reports and develop recommendations for how stakeholders can apply evidence to improve the quality and value of health care. Learn more about the New England CEPAC process, and find out how topics are selected.
New England CEPAC directly engages clinicians, patients, and payers during public meetings to discuss implications of the evidence for clinical decision-making and coverage policies. Application of evidence takes shape through new medical policies, benefit designs, and patient and clinician tools to improve clinical care and patient outcomes. All members of the New England CEPAC must meet ICER’s criteria for Conflict of Interest.
The box below provides information on the topic of the next meeting of the New England CEPAC. For more information about past and other upcoming meetings, see the box to the right.
The New England CEPAC will convene to review the comparative clinical effectiveness and value of emicizumab for treatment of hemophilia A.
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) will develop a report assessing the comparative clinical effectiveness and value of emicizumab (Genentech/Roche), a monoclonal antibody currently under review by the FDA for prevention of bleeding in patients who have hemophilia A with coagulation factor VIII inhibitors. Factor VIII is the clotting protein that is deficient in hemophilia A, and inhibitors interfere with factor replacement therapy. An FDA approval decision is expected in the first quarter of 2018.View materials